Setup Ripe for Defense Tech Startups to Shine

‍

In an era marked by escalating geopolitical tensions and evolving warfare dynamics, the defense tech industry has emerged as a critical domain for investment and innovation. The industry is also instrumental in the US’ quest to uphold its national security advantage against rivals like China and Russia. Accordingly, VCs are recognizing the immense potential of defense tech startups and are fueling their growth with substantial investments. 

In the last three years, VCs have invested nearly $20 billion in aerospace and defense tech start-ups, per Pitchbook. This is nearly four times the amount invested between 2010 and 2019, an indication of VCs’ growing appetite for this flourishing sector. In May 2023, for instance, Andreessen Horowitz announced a $500 million fund to back early-stage companies that “support the national interest”. Notably, Pitchbook data also shows that acquisitions accounted for 71% of defense tech VC exits from 2016 to 2021, underscoring the strategic value of these companies to larger players in the industry. 

The growth of these start-ups can be attributed to, among others, their ability to develop technologies with dual-use applications, serving both military and commercial purposes. By expanding their market reach beyond the confines of the defense sector, these start-ups have unlocked new avenues for venture-worthy expansion and innovation. This strategic approach has enabled these companies to achieve significant growth that surpasses what could be attained solely through government contracts. For instance, Shift5, which recently closed an $83 million Series B funding round, serves military units, as well as other critical infrastructure operators. The company offers solutions to enhance the monitoring capabilities of physical infrastructure systems, including aircraft, trains, and military weapons systems. 

As the nature of warfare evolves, characterized by technologies such as artificial intelligence, autonomous weapons, and cyber warfare, agility, innovation, and technology prowess become paramount for maintaining a competitive edge. Accordingly, the Department of Defense is allocating a significant portion of its $300 billion research, development, testing, evaluation, and procurement budget to these areas. Additionally, the government’s emphasis on national security goals and the creation of innovation hubs, such as the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Defense Innovation Unit, National Security Innovation Capital, In-Q-Tel, and AFWERX have created fertile ground for the development of critical technologies, attracting funding and fostering growth in the sector. Further, capital providers like the Office of Strategic Capital are bridging the gap between the military, entrepreneurs, and investors.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has also proved to be a great lesson for the armed forces on adopting new technologies in warfare. For US defense tech firms, Ukraine became a proving ground to showcase their latest technologies. Geospatial intelligence companies like Maxar Technologies have assisted Ukraine by using AI-enhanced systems to convert satellite imagery into intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance advantages. Anduril, arguably a pioneer of the VC-backed defense tech boom, also supported Ukraine with hardware, software and people. The company, valued at $8.5 billion, has built technology that could allow a single operator to control ‘hundreds’ of autonomous systems. This technology has the potential to be a game changer for the Pentagon’s operations by overcoming the limitations imposed by budgetary constraints and operational limitations 

Like every other field, AI is also penetrating the defense sector, becoming a powerful tool for decision-makers on the battlefield. California-based Shield AI develops artificial intelligence-powered fighter pilots, drones, and technology for defense operations, and is serving clients such as the US Air Force, US Army, and Brazil Armed Forces. Washington, DC-based Rebellion Defense also leverages AI and ML to empower the military and civil servants to solve defense challenges for the government.

With the Pentagon changing its slow-moving military procurement bureaucracy and embracing startups, the landscape of the defense industry is undergoing a remarkable transformation. Pitchbook estimates the defense tech market to reach $184.7 billion by 2027 from $76 billion in 2022, growing at a 15.9% CAGR, propelled by the government’s increasing demand for innovative dual-use technologies. Escalating geopolitical tensions have led to increased demand for advanced defense technologies with global military expenditure rising 3.7% to $2.24 trillion in 2022. This heightened demand not only benefits traditional defense contractors but also creates a host of opportunities for technology companies and startups to innovate and compete within the burgeoning defense tech market.**

Generative AI Regulation - A Delicate Balancing Act

The arrival of new technologies typically stirs a mix of excitement as well as anxiety. However, the degree of concern surrounding the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) advancements is significant. The rapid progress of AI has not only prompted regulatory scrutiny but also a comprehensive evaluation of its potential impact.

Regulators worldwide are actively working toward the regulation of generative AI. Notably, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently urged members of Congress in the US to implement AI regulations. Altman, actively involved in a robust lobbying campaign, has sought discussions with congressional leaders from both political parties to emphasize the significance of regulating AI. In a significant development, the European Parliament’s committee of lawmakers approved the EU’s AI Act in May, bringing it closer to becoming a law. This regulation adopts a risk-based approach and includes specific requirements for developers of “foundation models” like ChatGPT, ensuring compliance with copyright laws in their training data. China is also poised to present a draft of its AI law to the country’s lawmakers for review later this year. Furthermore, the Canadian parliament is also considering its own hotly contested Artificial Intelligence and Data Act.

The generative AI landscape is rapidly evolving, making it challenging to craft specific and comprehensive regulations that can keep pace with the technology’s rapid advancements. Instead of rigid regulations, a more suitable approach would be to establish guardrails that foster responsible development and deployment of generative AI.

While the advocates of heavy regulation argue that there is a need for a separate regulatory entity to oversee generative AI, it is important to recognize that the legal framework surrounding AI already exists, albeit in a broader context. Laws such as intellectual property rights, privacy regulations, and anti-discrimination laws can effectively address potential issues related to generative AI without stifling its progress. US Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon is working on the Algorithmic Accountability Act, a law that would require testing of high-risk AI before deployment. 

AI is already subject to significant regulation, including data protection laws like the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation and the US’s Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. These regulations play a crucial role in safeguarding personal information and ensuring accountability.

It is also worth noting that generative AI is already being utilized in heavily regulated sectors such as healthcare and finance, highlighting the existing framework of regulations in these critical domains. Moving forward, the regulation of specific sectors within the AI landscape will remain vital. As AI continues to advance and permeate various industries, targeted regulations tailored to each sector’s unique challenges and requirements will play a crucial role in ensuring ethical and responsible AI deployment. Such sector-specific regulations can address concerns related to privacy, security, transparency, bias, and accountability, among other important considerations.

However, lawmakers must remain wary of the lobbying efforts exerted by influential Big Tech companies such as Alphabet, Microsoft, and OpenAI. These companies possess significant resources and political influence, which can sway policy and regulatory decisions in their favor. While their contributions to innovation and technological advancement are undeniable, it is essential for lawmakers to maintain an independent and objective perspective. By critically evaluating the lobbying activities of these companies, lawmakers can ensure that regulations are formulated in the best interest of the public and not unduly influenced by private agendas.

At the heart of the ongoing debate surrounding the regulation of AI lies the fundamental challenge of striking the right balance between mitigating risks and fostering its continued growth. This intricate task demands an approach that involves comprehensive deliberation and engagement from various stakeholders, rather than solely relying on technologists to determine the course of action.**